PolicyBlog

A Technology and Telecommunications Policy Blog

 

FCC Action Needed to Protect Consumer Choice

Eric Rabe posted in PolicyBlog Video Policy  on June 02, 2009, 03:36 PM EST

Although Verizon offers more than 100 HD channels in every FiOS TV market, there are two channels we currently can’t provide in high definition to our customers in downstate New York, western New York and northern New Jersey – the regional sports channels MSG and MSG Plus.

 

As I've stated before, the reason is simple: Cablevision, which owns MSG and MSG Plus, refuses to supply the programming in high definition to us.  Then Cablevision advertises that they have the most high-definition sports programming in their region.  Of course, they will sell this programming in HD to the other cable guys, like Comcast and Time Warner Cable, against whom they don’t compete head-to-head.  Pretty audacious. 

 

But wait.  Doesn’t the FCC require that cable companies make the programming they control available to competitors?  Well, yes.  But Cablevision and some of its brethren maintain that they can refuse to provide certain programming – including the regional and local sports programming that the FCC has called “must have” for many consumers – by exploiting the famous “terrestrial loophole” and routing the programming to other providers using terrestrial wires, rather than satellites.  The Long Island cable company argues that since they deliver the “HD feed” of their sports channels terrestrially, they don’t have to provide the HD.

 

Today, we asked the Federal Communications Commission to stop cable companies from blocking access to the regional sports programming or the HD format of that programming, no matter how a cable incumbent may decide to deliver it.  It’s pretty obvious that actions like these by the cable companies deny consumers a meaningful competitive choice in video services.  As one federal court recognized earlier this week, the Cable Act authorizes the FCC to take action to prevent these types of anticompetitive practices.

 

We know that regional sports programming, and the HD of that programming, are important, and many consumers simply won’t choose FiOS TV or any other video service if they can’t watch their local sports teams or if they can’t watch them in HD.  It’s time for the FCC to take action and ensure that consumers really have a meaningful choice.

 

Update (6/2/09):

 

Our filing at the FCC about access to regional sports programming is receiving some coverage in the news media.  You can read it at...

 

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/277272-Verizon_Weighs_In_On_RSN_Access.php

 

http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2009/05/garden_state_briefs_1.html

 

http://libn.com/libizblog/2009/06/01/in-msg-war-verizon-asks-fcc-to-intervene/.

 

Reader Comments
fianlly after almost 11 months since July 25, but I don't get when on 7/25 /08 until yesterday you claimed that a FCC complaint was filed, but it wasnt filed until today
Billy Burgess posted on 5/28/2009 11:05:06 PM
Eric- Great to see that Verizon is pursuing Cablevision on this travesty. Is there any idea as to how long it will take the FCC to act on Verizon's demands that they (the FCC) force the Dolans to stop acting like three year olds who won't share their toys? Certainly hope it happens in time for next year's NHL and NBA seasons
Chet posted on 5/29/2009 1:33:53 AM
Eric, Don't know if this is a similar issue or not, but will FIOS at any time be offering MSNBC to its Long Island customers? I know that there was some kind of carrier agreement between the two companies but I'd love to jump ship to FIOS if this channel ever became available.
Paul C. posted on 5/29/2009 8:07:48 PM
Billy, We did file with the FCC last year, and our filing on May 28 is new. Eric
Eric Rabe posted on 5/29/2009 8:18:30 PM
ok, but I was just wondering that this May 28 filing made news , and the one last year didnt get past the policyblog . What is your update on FIOS1 and Staten Island Local Programming , so we can get all these on and I can go back to Verizon as a customer in Staten Island ? Thanks Billy
billy posted on 5/30/2009 12:30:32 PM
MSG & MSG Plus is one thing, and I'm glad you filed with the FCC. The big question here is: HOW LONG WILL THE FCC TAKE BEFORE THEY ANSWER? And I'd like to take it a step forward, what about MSNBC??? When I switched from Cablevision I did not know about not getting MSNBC. I have learned (unofficially) that there is an exclusive distribution contract, but I have no idea when it ends. I even called Cablevision and they LIED to me, saying that they didn't block it from Verizon. I felt like I was fighting city hall, so I dropped it.
Marvin Kirschenbaum posted on 6/1/2009 7:36:56 PM
You say that a file of complaint was filed at the FCC last year, which is believable , howcome it never made media press like this one did May 28 ?
Billy Burgess posted on 6/5/2009 2:21:04 PM
That seems much like refusing to "allow" the paying HDTV customer to capture HD programing via HDMI and forcing them to use component cables. Maybe it's more akin to the cablecard (M) fiasco?
S posted on 6/10/2009 1:16:51 PM
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this website until a moderator has approved them. The name you enter here will appear next to your comment. You must enter a valid email address to submit a comment.
Name *
Email *
Website
Comments *
Please Add 7 and 2 and type the answer here *
Submit

Subscribe to the Blog


 

Add to my MSN
Add to my Yahoo
Add to Google
Add to Technorati
Add to Bloglines
Follow us on Twitter

 

Categories

GO

 

Policy Blog TV | View All Video


 

Recent Contributors

Link Hoewing
"Washington CAN Get it When it Comes to the Internet - Here’s How" via Tweet this

John 'CZ' Czwartacki
"Connections, Food Fights and the Competitive Internet Ecosystem" via Tweet this

Kathy Brown
"Winter Doesn’t Chill Summer Jobs Push" via Tweet this

Tom Tauke
"Guest Column: Our Nation's Day of Reckoning is At Hand" via Tweet this

Kathy Grillo
"FCC Honors Accessibility Innovators" via Tweet this

All Contributors

 

GO

Tag Cloud