PolicyBlog

I think the generally negative reactions to the wireline elements of the google-verizon framework originate mainly due to the fact that the exceptions to some of the pro-consumer elements threaten to swallow up the rules. Consumers don't have faith that the incumbent providers will "do the right thing" by them based on a long history of contrary practices. Coupled with a provision taking away the FCC's ability to create a somewhat level playing field through rulemaking, and you have a recipe for continued distrust. Verizon is up to many good things with its FIOS services, which offer meaningful choice in many markets it serves. But it's not enough. And the framework that has been proposed is an example of Verizon falling short in living up to the true promise of the internet. So, no, I don't think USA today editorial board erred in crafting its commentary on how the proposed Google-Verizon framework falls short. People want maximum choice, not protections for the supposedly "innovative" incumbent providers. The innovators have not been the incumbents. Would DVRs even exist today without startups like TiVo? VOIP without Vonage? Placeshifting without Slingbox? On the wireless front, VZ needs to go beyond lip service about dismantling the walled garden concept. If its truly about the "network," people will continue to pay a premium for access to it. They just want to consume the services available on it in the interface they choose, with the devices they choose, and on a non-discriminatory basis.

Yes you are. We are all talking about the mobile internet...you know the future in 5-8 years when 4g and 5g become comletely saturated. It is imperative that the wireless world is a seamless part of the internet proper as that is how most of us will have access in 2020. Geez stop with the corporate greed and try to do the right thing. I know its not that appealing to just be a low-margin steady utility but someone has to do it.

"And the charge that we would “limit users” to content and applications of carriers’ choosing is ridiculous." Oh good, I'll be sure to trust your claim because...wait, why, again?