Verizon Logo Search the blog       Go  Go  
VZBlog
Blog Home
Broadband
Wireless
Video
Voice-VoIP
Web 2.0
Policy
Net Regulation
Gaming
David Old Regulations Bite the Dust
Posted by David Fish in Policy on September 04, 2007, 03:24 PM EST
Add to: Del.icio.us |  Digg |  Reddit

A bit of good news for consumers – and those at this company and others vying for their business – may have gone unnoticed by some over the long weekend.

 

Friday evening, the Federal Communications Commission issued a news release with the headline “FCC Replaces Outmoded Long-Distance Rules With New Protections For Consumers.”  Those outmoded rules required companies like Verizon, AT&T and Qwest to offer in-region, long-distance service through a separate subsidiary in order to avoid the various regulations and constraints associated with being branded a “dominant carrier.”

 

In short, we’ll be able to provide long-distance and other services to consumers under one roof, in some cases using the same Verizon employees and equipment.  This makes sense in the era of convergence, competition and bundling.  In the words of analyst Anna-Maria Kovacs, “This move eliminates various costs for [the companies], gives them more marketing flexibility, and eliminates some awkwardness in their transactions with customers.” 

 

Another benefit for residential consumers is the agreement by the companies to provide special residential calling plans for up to three years for those few people who make very few long-distance calls, do not have wireless, or do not have access to VOIP calling.

 

What precipitated this order?  In a word, competition.  As FCC Commissioners Copps and Adelstein said in their joint statement, “We support this relief, with the conditions and commitments included therein, because the Commission must take into account the changing long-distance market.”  In the words of Commissioner McDowell, “This is a classic instance where regulation had been appropriate…but where the relevant market has become sufficiently competitive to warrant less onerous regulations, while continuing to protect consumers.”





0 Comments
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this website until a moderator has approved them. The name you enter here will appear next to your comment. You must enter a valid email address to submit a comment.
Name *
E-mail *
Website
Comments *
Please add 8 and 2 and type the answer here:
Guidelines for posting comment on policyblog.
By submitting my comments, I agree to allow Verizon to use my name and comments in whole or in part on the policyblog site without further permission or compensation. I understand that all comments I submit become the property of Verizon and that I release all rights and claims to the content I submit or post to policyblog. The comments I submit are my own original creation and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of Verizon or its employees. I understand that I am responsible for the statements made and views taken in my posts and I acknowledge that my comments will be subject to review by Verizon and may or may not be published.
Subscribe to PolicyBlog

Add to my MSN
Add to my Yahoo
Add to Google
Add to Technorati
Add to Bloglines
Twitter
Recent Posts

No Verizon Dispute
Thoughts on ITIF Network Management Report
IT Can Lead U.S. to High-Tech, Low-Carbon Growth
Do We Need Faster PCs?
VZ Wireless CEO Comments on Cell Record Access
Verizon News Center’s New Look
PolicyBlog Bloggers

Go Read More
Calendar

January, 2009
SMTWTFS
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Important Links

About PolicyBlog
Comment Policy
Disclaimer / Terms Of Use