6 Comments
|
|
|
|
"I am not against ETFs, as I understand its role in keeping initial costs of the hardware down..."
Bullocks.
Their argument on certain phones is the technology is what makes it expensive. I spent over $400 for my Samsung smart phone. You can't charge for expensive phones, then charge again for ETF's. The insinuation is that the money is coming from one source, not multiple sources.
|
| Posted by:
Max
on
March 10, 2009, 01:53 PM EST
|
Comment Permalink
|
|
Just left my local verizon Store. All I wanted to do was drop a line (would be down to 2 lines) and update our phones. I was told that there would be a $175 early termination fee for droping the line. Now our contract expires in 4 months. No mention of a pro-rated fee. Just that I signed a contract and had to live up to it. Was I asking for something outside the contract? Yes I was. Is it reasonable, probably. Acceptable to the srore personnel. Not at all, after all I did sign a contract. I was asked if it would be reasonable for all ETF to be waived (this is a common statement to avoid a direct answer to a question) for all customers? I replied no, but I am not interested in other customers just my situation. No I am not a new customer to Verizon. I have had 3 lines for 8 years and a contract with Verizon for 10-12 years. So much for loyalty to the customer... If the store personnel don't know or understand customer retention I just wonder... Although it is refreshing to see that Verizon has taken on the "old" phone company attitude of "We don't have to care, we are the phone company". To the phone companies-your employees attitudes are the reason we (the comsumers) need government intervention.
|
| Posted by:
KJ
on
August 16, 2008, 11:25 PM EST
|
Comment Permalink
|
|
"... we’ll take $5 off the ETF for every month of the contract that’s completed" How about reducing the early termination fee by 1/24th each month of a two-year commitment ? 15 months x $5 = $75 15 months x $8.33 = $125
|
| Posted by:
Richard C Haven
on
August 11, 2008, 07:10 PM EST
|
Comment Permalink
|
|
I am not against ETFs, as I understand its role in keeping initial costs of the hardware down, and I have been a happy Verizon Wireless customer since it was still AirTouch so I've no problem signing up every 2 years. I do however agree that $5 for every completed contract month is a bit piddle. Sigh, but I only say this because I am faced with this very question. The only thing I can say is - keep your customer service standards high and regard customer privacy as sacred and you won't have too many people screaming to opt out of a contract. Oh, and if customers complete the contract, they can choose not to renew and just stick to a month-to-month.
|
| Posted by:
Jae Holt
on
August 02, 2008, 01:46 PM EST
|
Comment Permalink
|
|
Interesting that you fail to mention how much (175.00) the ETF is. A $5 a month reduction is merely window dressing to make it appear that Verizon is consumer friendly. We are already aware of your amazing committment to public privacy via your warrentless cooperation with illegal federal information seizures. Nice job VW. I've had every wireless provider under the sun and I regret none of them more than you.
|
| Posted by:
Jerry Burkey
on
June 16, 2008, 02:27 PM EST
|
Comment Permalink
|
|
Congratulations. Now you only have to teach your customer service reps how to do basic math.
|
| Posted by:
Stop
on
February 06, 2008, 10:39 AM EST
|
Comment Permalink
|
|
|
|
PolicyBlog
Bloggers
|
|
|
|
Go  |
|
| Calendar |
|
 |
July, 2009 |
 |
|
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
|
|
|