Verizon Logo Search the blog       Go  Go  
VZBlog
Blog Home
Broadband
Wireless
Video
Voice-VoIP
Web 2.0
Policy
Net Regulation
Gaming
Link Googling Taxes
Posted by Link Hoewing in Policy on September 21, 2007, 02:28 PM EST
Add to: Del.icio.us |  Digg |  Reddit

You would think with all of the policy debates surrounding broadband policy in recent months that Verizon is not in the same place as Google on almost any issue.  But that is not true.  Google’s Policy Counsel Pablo Chavez just wrote an excellent post on the importance of making permanent the Internet Tax Moratorium and on this issue I can say we are in exactly the same place.

 

What Google argues persuasively is that content and applications providers have a special reason to want to see the moratorium extended.    The extension includes provisions that prohibit multiple or discriminatory taxation of online applications or services.   He explains that this would ensure that online services – which often cross multiple jurisdictions in reaching their ultimate destination – are not put into an unfair position vis-à-vis services or goods they might compete with that are sold out of “bricks and mortar” stores.

 

As a company that is a communications and network company, we provide access to content through our networks but we are not involved in developing that content.  We rely on companies like Google to provide consumers with services and applications they want and need so that our broadband services are in demand.  There is a “virtuous cycle” at play here as we build networks with more capacity while consumers, content and applications providers find new ways to take advantage of those networks.

 

It may not often seem like we can not see eye to eye in the broadband sector but we are all part of the high tech sector, driven by ever more capable networks and more imaginative content and applications.   We too believe the Internet Tax Moratorium should be made permanent and on this one, I’ve “Googled” the same answer as Pablo.





0 Comments
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this website until a moderator has approved them. The name you enter here will appear next to your comment. You must enter a valid email address to submit a comment.
Name *
E-mail *
Website
Comments *
Guidelines for posting comment on policyblog.
By submitting my comments, I agree to allow Verizon to use my name and comments in whole or in part on the policyblog site without further permission or compensation. I understand that all comments I submit become the property of Verizon and that I release all rights and claims to the content I submit or post to policyblog. The comments I submit are my own original creation and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of Verizon or its employees. I understand that I am responsible for the statements made and views taken in my posts and I acknowledge that my comments will be subject to review by Verizon and may or may not be published.
Subscribe to PolicyBlog

Add to my MSN
Add to my Yahoo
Add to Google
Add to Technorati
Add to Bloglines
Recent Posts

Fraudulent Sweepstakes Alert
A Really Good DSL Experience
Why we are Bullish on FiOS
The Broadband Battle Continues
History Lessons - Broadband and IT
Pardon Our Dust... and Error Messages
PolicyBlog Bloggers

Go Read More
Calendar

September, 2008
SMTWTFS
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930
Important Links

About PolicyBlog
Comment Policy
Disclaimer / Terms Of Use